New large Stock of Open Box Sony FE cameras and lenses at BestBuy, Samys and OneCall.

Share

[shoplink 46399 ebay]BestBUyA7rII[/shoplink]

You save $400 on the Open Box Sony A7rII sold by [shoplink 46399 ebay]BestBuy on eBay (Click here)[/shoplink]. That Open Box deal comes with full 1 year manufacturer warranty. BestBuy writes:

“Excellent – Products in Excellent condition look brand new with no physical flaws, scratches or scuffs and include all original parts and accessories. The product will be in its original packaging or a suitable replacement box.”

And there are more of those Open Box deals at BestBuy, Samys and OneCall:
$400 off on the Sony A7rII at [shoplink 46399 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink].
$250 off on the Sony A7II at [shoplink 46393 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink].
$200 off on the Sony A7II with kit lens at [shoplink 46396 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink].
$180 off on the  Zeiss 55mm f/1.8 FE lens at [shoplink 46474 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink].
$200 off on the Sony A7r at [shoplink 46392 ebay]Samys (Click here)[/shoplink].
$150 off on the A6300 with kit lens at [shoplink 46428 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink]
$150 off on the RX100m4 at [shoplink 46389 ebay]OneCall (Click here)[/shoplink].
$140 off on the Sony A7 with kit lens at [shoplink 46397 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink].
$120 off on the Sony A6000 at [shoplink 46394 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink].
$110 off on the Zeiss FE 16-35mm lens at [shoplink 46398 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink].
$100 off on the Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 FE lens at [shoplink 46391 ebay]Samys (Click here)[/shoplink].
$70 off on the Sony 28mm FE lens sold by [shoplink 46429 ebay]BestBuy (Click here)[/shoplink].
$70 off on the Sony 16-50mm pancake E-mount lens sold by [shoplink 46390 ebay]Samys (Click here)[/shoplink].

Share

(Guest post) Full 85mm f/1.4 GM lens review by German Photographer Enrico Heller

Share

ehp-21

The following is a guest post from Enrico Heller (http://eh-photo.de/blog/80). He reviewed the brand new 85mm f/1.4 GM lens that will start shipping the coming days at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuyAmazon Germany. Calumetphoto.de. WexUK. Jessops.

——

I recently received my Sony G-Master FE85mm F1.4 and want to share my impressions and testing results with you. I tested the lens on a Sony A7RM2. My mainscope is on rendering and bokeh quality, but I do always begin with checkout the optical quality of a lens. I hope my results will help you.

A 85mm lens is my prefered lens for studio work and on location shoots. I also use it on weddings.

One weak point in the Sony E-Mount system was the missing of a 85mm F1.4. I hope the new G-Master lens will solve this point. I used a Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 on location and the Sony G OSS 90mm F2.8 in studio before. The Batis was a very good lens, but no F1.4 so I sold my Batis. If you interesstet in the Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 you can checkout my comparision with the Sony G OSS 90mm F2.8 (click HERE).

Build Quality and AF

The Sony FE85 F1.4 GM is a very heavy and bulky lens like most other 85mm F1.4 lenses out there. It’s made very solid and feels like a professional lens what it is. There is a very useful focus hold button and aperture ring. For filmer there is also a declick button to make the aperture clickless.

As I unboxed the lens the focus ring sounds a bit scratchy. Like if metal scratches on metal. I read in several forums that there are scratches inside lens so I was a bit afraid. After 500 shots the scratching sound is gone. And there are no scratches inside the lense.  I’m sure that is something like oil or lubricant and this wasn’t all over the contact area. Puhh…

The autofocus was the next challenge. The AF was very loud and was bumping all the time. Continuous AF wasn’t useable for me. The solution and a very IMPORTEND point is to update you camera to the latest firmware! After I updated to v3.1 the AF worked very well. In normal working conditions it nails the focus in AF-S / AF-C and Eye-AF very preceise.
The AF isn’t that fast but fast enough for portrait work. I would not expect more for this kind of lens.

Image Quality

Sharpness

As usally I test new lenses on my testing wall. It is very helpful to find quality issues like with my Sony Distagon T* FE 35 mm F1,4 ZA (check out my test HERE). It also help me to find strength and weak points of my lenses. I always test three zones.

  • A – Center
  • B – Edge
  • C – Corner

The focus distance for the Sony FE85mm F1.4 GM is 2.69m (8.82 ft).

It is always helpful if there is a compentitor to compare and rank the results. I used my Sony G OSS 90mm F2.8 to compare the lenes. The focus distance of the G 90 was 2.99m (9.8ft) to compensate the different focal lenght. The macro lens is the sharpest native lens in the Sony E-Mount, so it is a strong compentitor in this kind of testing.

overview

Zone A – the Center

The results are really good. The G-Master is razor sharp even at F1.4. The lens is sightly better than the Sony G OSS 90mm F2.8 over the full range.

za

Zone B – the Edge

The good results are shown in the edge again. Even at F1.4 is the edge crisp an clear. The macro lens loses over the full F-Stop range.

zb

Zone C – the Corner

As I have seen the corner I was a bit flashed. This lens is at F1.4 razor sharp even in the Corner. Thats are really amazing results. Sony did a very good job!

The lens is sharper over the full frame than the Sony G OSS 90mm F2.8

zc

Shooting charts worth nothing at the end of the day if you can’t confirm them in real live shots. My cat is a very good vitim to check the lens sharpness in studio.

ehp-19ehp-20

Both lenses are tak sharp and I’m sure you won’t see a different even at large prints. But you can see the Sony G-Master FE85mm F1.4 is sightly sharper than the macro lens.

sidebyside

You can see one Shot of the same szene at F1.4 in Example Images

As usual I get asked for focus at infinity shots. So I made a landscape comparision shot. I need to say it was a bit windy at this day but I think this shot is good enough to show the performance.

I see more details in the shot from the Sony FE85mm F1.4 GM. It has also more punshy colors.

ehp-28ehp-29

sidebyside (1)

Vignetting

With disabling the light falloff correction in the A7RM2 there is a noticeable vignetting at F1.4. At F2.8 it is mostly gone. I expected this vignetting wide open like other 85mm F1.4 lenses. Per default I correct this in the camera.

vig

Distorsion

Its mostly the same like vignetting. There is a very sigtly distorsion if you disable the correction inside the camera. But its so minor that you wont see this in a real live picture even if you have the correction disabled. This was one weakness of my Zeiss Batis 1.8/85. Ok this is a portrait lens and distorsion isn’t a problem there but so it’s possible to use the lense for other kind of work too.

8

Flares and Chromatic Aberrations

In test chart environment you can find well controlled Longitudinal Chormatic Aberrations (LoCA) chromatic aberration.

ca

Here you can see a real live shot with minor LoCa.

loca_ex

I couldn’t found lateral chromatic aberrations on my test charts.

latCA

And I also couldn’t see lateral CA on real live images.

ca_ex

Till now I couldn’t see any flares. So I think the lens has no problem with it. But if I get any problems with it, I will update it later.

Rendering and Bokeh

The Bokeh can be rated very various. What one person likes do another person hates. So rank my results for your self. As usally a creamy, smooth bokeh with decent pointed lights is more often prefered.

 

Sony 85 F1.4 GM Bokeh Balls

The bokeh balls are importend for the rendering because it can redirect the viewers focus from the motive to the out of focus (OOF) area, if the bokeh balls are asymmetric or have markings (onion rings). It also can makes the OOF area more nervous.

Many modern lenes suffering by onion rings as a result of the usage of aspherical elements. For my self I dislike onion rings more than cat eyes (unround bokeh balls). For example the Zeiss Batis 1.8/85 shows a lot of cat eyes but it has no or rarely onion rings. The Sony G OSS 90mm F2.8 shows visible onion rings. That was one reason why I used the G 90mm just in studio.

To test the bokeh balls of the Sony 85 1.4 GM I shot some LED lights with differen apertures. The used focus distance was the minimal focus distance of the lens (0.8m | 2,6 ft), the distance to the lights was 1.5m (4,92ft).

Here you can see the overview:

Here you can see the results:

bubbles

The Sony G-Master 85 F1.4 produce circular bokeh balls, even diagonally light getting’s almost round bokeh balls. In bright big lights you can see slightly onion rings. I think this amout of onion rings you could not see in real images. Thats a very good result in my eyes. Smaller lights are mostly circular without marking. Stopped down and focus to the LED’s, the lights getting nice sun stars.


Bokeh

I used a difficult szene with leafs and a lot of highlights and shot images from F1.4 until F8

I really like the background blur of the Sony FE85mm F1.4 GM it is very soft, smooth and silky. Pointed lights are not getting a nervous bokeh.

I was a bit afraid to get another “clinical” modern lens, but now I think that lens has it own character. It renders very pleasant and I feel it has a nice three-dimensional look.

Conclusions

I can’t offer final conclusions in that short testing period, but I’m very impressed how good the optical performance of this lens is. There is literaly no real downside for this lens at the moment. The weight and size is what physical can be expected and the AF is fast enough for the task. Sure if I should improve something on this lens it would be the AF speed but I see there no issue.

I will update my conclusions when my testing for rendering and bokeh are done.

———

Original article and images can be read at http://eh-photo.de/blog/80

Gm lens store links:
85mm f/1.4 GM FE at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuyAmazon Germany. Calumetphoto.de. WexUK. Jessops.
24-70mm f/2.8 GM FE at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuyAmazon Germany. Calumetphoto.de. WexUK. Jessops.

Share

Ken Rockwell likes the A6300. And 3Dkraft posts first A6300 aerial work.

Share

a6300_FE2470GM_image_white

The usually not so Sony friendly reviewer Ken Rockwell seems to likk the A6300 a lot:

The A6300 is a fantastic little camera. If you think you want one, get one. I love its EVF, speed, tiny size, tough build and great looking pictures in any light — as well as its completely silent operation. It just shoots and shoots and shoots in any light, even with the tiny kit lens.

And 3DKraft posted that first A6300 aerial video:

Some wannabe” tech-gurus” say, the A6300 suffers from strong moiré as it has no 4K optimised low pass filter. I can not confirm this as long as you use the Super35mm 4K mode which downscales the 4K from approx. 6K.

Sony A6300 on DJI Matrice 100 – Aerial Test 4K UHD from Hacky on Vimeo.

Gm lens and A6300 store links:
85mm f/1.4 GM FE at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuyAmazon Germany. Calumetphoto.de. WexUK. Jessops.
24-70mm f/2.8 GM FE at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuyAmazon Germany. Calumetphoto.de. WexUK. Jessops.
A6300 body at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuy. Calumetphoto.de. Amazon.de. WexUK. Jessops. Amazon.fr.
A6300 with kit lens at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuy. Calumetphoto.de. Amazon.de. WexUK. Jessops.

You can now place your preorder on the newly announced Sony FE lenses and the RX10m3:
FE 50mm f/1.8 at BHphoto. Amazon. Adorama. FocusCamera. Calumet Germany. WexUK. Jessops.
FE 70-300mm at BHphoto. Amazon. AdoramaFocusCamera. Calumet Germany. WexUK. Jessops.
RX10m3 at BHphoto. Amazon. AdoramaFocusCamera. Calumet Germany. WexUK. Jessops.

Share

Lensrentals reviews the new 24-70mm GM lens: “impressive MTF curves with excellent resolution”

Share

Lensrentals tested the new 24-70mm Sony GM lens and there are two good news:

  1. World Class Optical Quality:
    LR writes that it has “impressive MTF curves with excellent resolution“. Compared with the Canon and Nikon 24-70mm lenses “the Sony is at least as good as the other two lenses. It actually has the best center resolution, particularly at higher frequencies, which backs up Sony’s statement that this lens was designed with high-resolution sensors in mind.
  2. Low Copy-to-Copy Variation:
    To my surprise and pleasure, the variation of the Sony G Master lenses at 24mm is at least as low as, and perhaps a bit better than, the Canon and Nikon zooms, both of which we consider good for zooms.

Finally Sony is catching up (and maybe surpassing) with the big guys!

GM lens store links:
85mm f/1.4 GM FE at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuyAmazon Germany. Calumetphoto.de. WexUK. Jessops.
24-70mm f/2.8 GM FE at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, BestBuyAmazon Germany. Calumetphoto.de. WexUK. Jessops.

 

Share

The big Sony lens savings: Up to 25% off on E and A-mount lenses!

Share

Sony_lenses

Sony US launched rebates on plenty of Sony-Zeiss E and A-mount lenses and on accessories. The best overview can be seen on that BHphoto page (Click here). You save up to 25%!

Here are the links to E-mount and accessory deals:

Full Frame E-mount lenses:
$25 off on the Sony 21mm f/2.8-22 Ultra Wide Converter Lens at Amazon.
$25 off on the 24-240mm lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$25 off on the Sony 28mm FE lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto.
$100 off on the Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto.
$100 off on the Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$100 off on the Zeiss 55mm f/1.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$100 off on the 70-200mm G lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$100 off on the 90mm macro lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto.

APS-C E-mount lenses:
$25 off on the Sony VCLECF2 10-13mm f/2.8-22 Fisheye Lens Fixed Prime Fisheye Converter at Amazon.
$100 off on the 10-18mm lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$25 off on the Sony VCLECU2 12-16mm f/2.8 Petal Shaped Fixed Ultra Wide Converter for SEL16F28 and SEL20F28 at Amazon.
$25 off on the 16mm f/2.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$50 off on the 16-50mm lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$100 off on the 16-70mm Zeiss lens at Amazon, BHphoto, Adorama.
$100 off on the 18-200mm lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$100 off on the 18-200mm PZ lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$50 off on the 35mm f/1.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$25 off on the lens 30mm macro at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.
$50 off on the 50mm f/1.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama and BHphoto.

Sony Accessories:
$100 off on the Sony Adaptor Kit with Microphone at Amazon.
$50 off on the Sony HVLF32M MI (Multi-interface shoe) Camera Flash at Amazon.
$50 off on the Sony HVLF43M High Power Flash with Quick Shift Bounce at Amazon.
$50 off on the Sony VGC2EM Vertical Grip at Amazon.
$50 off on the Sony LA-EA4 A-Mount to E-Mount FF Lens Adapter with TMT at Amazon.
$25 off on the Sony HVLF20M at Amazon.
$20 off on the Sony ECMGZ1M Gun / Zoom Microphone at Amazon.

Share

Debunking Sator’s article: “Sony’s Full Frame Pro Mirrorless Was a Fatal Mistake”

Share

aligned
One image to rule them all: Sony CAN make very compact FF lenses ;)

Photographer Sator is creating quite a buzz with his article “Why Sony’s Full Frame Pro Mirrorless Was a Fatal Mistake“. (Read here on PetaPixel).

I thought long if I should answer to this or not. I think there are many things “omitted” in his analysis and I want to point out some of those points. But first a disclaimer: I am not a Sony fanboy. I pointed out many Sony issues lately that I think are very annoying. For example service issues, horrible menu system, lens production quality issues and so on. Sony has still a long way to go to completely satisfy customers. That said I think Sator is not right on some of the points he mentions in the article:

1) Size doesn’t matter:

Let’s start with something I do agree with Sator: “SIZE” is not the major reason why you buy into the Sony system. In my opinion it’s Sony innovative tech package that makes the E-mount system popular. It’s not the “mirrorless” aspect that makes it attractive. But mirrorless is necessary for most of these innovative features to exist (like EVF tech, focus peaking and so on and on and on).

2) Sony CAN make smaller than DSLR lenses:

Sator also said: “Sony have failed to overcome the laws of physics. If you take something from the camera body, you have to give it back to the lens, and by the same amount.“. Well it’s true that most of the FE lenses are big. But here is Sator’s first mistake. He assumes FE lenses have to be big because “of the law of physics“. Please Sator give us the physics formula that says that? Where is the mathematic supporting your argument? Instead you bring up size comparisons made via CameraSize that are very questionable (more about it below).

He also misses to understand that Sony just started a system from scratch and the Sony declared main focus was to create very high quality lenses as first. And he assumes that because most of the current FE lenses are big this means we will not get smaller FE lenses. But that’s an assumption and not a “law of physics“.

Let’s discuss some examples he brought up by using the CameraSize tool:

Bildschirmfoto 2016-04-05 um 08.24.55

With that comparison between the [shoplink 46513 ebay]Zeiss 85mm A-mount lens[/shoplink] and the [shoplink 46512 ebay]85mm GM lens[/shoplink] he wants to demonstrates that a Sony FE camera+lens package is as big as a DSLR equivalent. Sorry to say but he is comparing apple and oranges here! The new 85mm GM lens is made for ultimate quality. It’s a future proof lens made for 100+ Megapixel FF sensor. And to achieve such a quality you have to make lenses…bigger! That’s why a [shoplink 46515 ebay]Zeiss Otus 85mm lens[/shoplink] is bigger than a Sigma lens with the same aperture:

Bildschirmfoto 2016-04-05 um 08.27.39

So let’s please compare lenses with “similar” image quality: For example the [shoplink 46527 ebay]Loxia 21m FE[/shoplink] and the [shoplink 46529 ebay]Milvus 21mm[/shoplink] lens. Note that CameraSize aligns the cameras including the EVF rubber. I re-aligned the images based on the camera back without the big rubber. I added the Loxia 21mm for myself as it’s not in the Camerasize database yet.

Look at how big the difference is!

Loxia

And to put it into “weight” terms. The Sony-Zeiss combination weights around 1kg and the Nikon-Zeiss combination around 1,7 kg. That is a Big weight savings! Sator writes that with Sony “FF mirrorless bodies you end up having to carry multiple batteries, which negate any size advantage.” A Sony battery weights around 40g. Even if you take 1 or even 2 additional batteries the weight difference is still huge!

Again if I would stick on Sator’s error to not take into account that lenses are also designed for different image quality performances I could play this game:

Bildschirmfoto 2016-04-05 um 08.57.52
You see? The Full Frame Sony with 16mm f/2.8 APS-C lens is way smaller than the APS-C X-PRO2 with 14mm f/2.8 lens :) Of course I do know the Fuji lens is a better lens here (and it’s 14mm and not 16mm). So I call this an unfair comparison. But if size is all that matters well Sony is smaller in that case!

Let’s make a more fair comparison: Here is the Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 vs the 18mm f/2.0 (29mm f/3.0 FF equivalent) comparison by CameraSize (re-aligned on the LCD screen)

aligned

The size is the same but the Sony has built-in IBIS and FF sensor in it! Impressive or not? So yes! Sony can make excellent quality and very compact lenses. And if Sony is reading this…please give us more of those :)
And please do note the Zeiss 35mm FE is “undoubtedly a very good performer” (to cite Photozone). Sony didn’t trade image quality for size on that lens.

To sum up:

The Zeiss FE 35mm and the Sony 28mm FE lenses do show that FF E-mount lenses CAN be more compact than similar performing DSLR lenses.
Moreover Sator didn’t recognize that owning a Sony A7 camera gives you an extreme flexibility: If small size is what matters you can use small APS-C or FF lenses on the very same E-mount. If extreme quality is what matters you can use the bigger FF GM lenses. Such a flexibility is yet second to none in the camera business!

Some more short remarks:

3) Sator forgets High ISO performance

When comparing the Batis 85mm f/1.8 lens and the Fuji 56mm f/1.2 lens he writes that the Fuji lens “allows you to shoot faster in low light. The Sony makes up for the slowness of the lens with IBIS, but this won’t stop action in low light.
He completely omits the fact that Full Frame sensor do have a much better High ISO performance. This means you crank up the ISO to get the shutter speed you need. So he is plain simple wrong when he says that a Fuji can shoot faster shutter times compared to a Sony FF.

4) In Body stabilization matters

Sator says Sony Image stabilization is degrading the image quality. I think this is Sator’s weakest argument. He brings up some quotes from Fuji, Sigma, Zeiss (Nor Sigma nor Zeiss do actually talk about Sony IBIS) to somehow convince you that E-mount was not designed to have IBIS. He doesn’t bring a real actual proof to support his thesis. All reviewers so far have stated the Sony image stabilization does a superb job. Dear Sator where are the actual FACTS supporting IBIS on Sony does hurt image quality? Can you proof it?

5) Adapting non-native lenses

I do agree with Sator that adapting lenses can be problematic. Many wide angle lenses do not perform well on Sony cameras. And you really need a very high quality adapter to avoid micro misalignment. He quotes Lensrentals to reinforce the argument that this is a problematic matter. But he lacks to mention also the “positive” aspects mentioned by Lensrentals. I do quote:

  1. Like a lot of tests, you can detect a very real difference in the lab that doesn’t make much difference at all in the real world.
  2. Videographers are the primary users of adapters, and probably won’t notice the problems at all.
  3. Putting a great lens on your camera via an adapter might still be better than an average native-mount lens.

Just to show three good reasons why it makes sense to adapt such lenses!

6) Live exposure preview

Sator: “This is something that is not yet the default modus operandi on most DSLR, but a new hybrid viewfinder patent from Canon suggests exposure preview is soon coming to DSLRs.“. Sticking to facts…Mirrorless is superior yet. A patent doesn’t change this now ….and just my two-cent guess…it will not change the future neither ;)

Message to Sator:
The point here is not to put any blame on you. I am very happy about the article you posted. It’s a good chance to discuss the matter! The intention of this post is to point out that you may have forgotten to mention some points and advantages of the Sony system. And while it’s fun and legit to speculate you have to separate facts from speculation. I am particularly talking about the arguments you made on Sony’s Image stabilization system.

A pro Fuji statement:
Sator is a Fuji photographer. And just to make it clear once again. I am no Sony fanboy. And as a “pure” photographer I will go so far to say that Fuji’s APS-C system is superior to Sony’s APS-C system. I can only hope Sony will “copy” many of the good things FUji did in those years!

Language disclosure:
My main language is German and Italian. My english is poor. Sorry for that when reading that article :)

Share