First Techart Contax G to NEX electronic adapter review by DC.watch.

[shoplink 20283 ebay][/shoplink]

There is a first review of the new [shoplink 20283 ebay]Contax G to NEX adapter[/shoplink] with electronic control at DC.Watch (google translation here). The performance really depends on the lens used. And the AF accuracy isn’t top notch. The manufacturer said that this is so because of lack of support from Sony. They hope to improve the AF performance with future updates.

You can find the [shoplink 20283 ebay]Techart Contax to NEX adapter on eBay (Click here)[/shoplink].

Here is the list of great G lenses with links to eBay price:
Hologon 16mm; 1:8 on [shoplink 16235 ebay]eBay (Click here)[/shoplink] -> (will not work on the DEO TECHART adapter).
Biogon T* 21 mm; 1:2,8 on [shoplink 16236 ebay]eBay (Click here)[/shoplink] -> (will not work on the DEO TECHART adapter).
Biogon T* 28 mm; 1:2,8 on [shoplink 16237 ebay]eBay (Click here)[/shoplink].
Planar T* 35 mm; 1:2,0 on [shoplink 16238 ebay]eBay (Click here)[/shoplink].
Planar T* 45 mm; 1:2,0 on [shoplink 16239 ebay]eBay (Click here)[/shoplink].
Sonnar T* 90 mm; 1:2,8 on [shoplink 16240 ebay]eBay (Click here)[/shoplink].
Vario-Sonnar T* 35 – 70 mm; 1:3,5-5,6 on [shoplink 16241 ebay]eBay (Click here)[/shoplink].

NEX Full Frame versus Leica M image comparison!


Image source: Lesnumeriques

If the NEX-FF will be launched in September one of the big question will be: How good will third party manual lenses work on that camera? So let’s take a look how good (or bad) the current VG900 sensor performs with these lenses. And let’s hope the new NEX-FF will be even more optimized for third party lens solution like the [shoplink 19605 ebay]Leica M Lenses[/shoplink], [shoplink 19923 ebay]Voigtlander M lenses[/shoplink], [shoplink 16763 ebay]Canon FD lenses[/shoplink] and[shoplink 19360 ebay]Zeiss ZM lenses[/shoplink].

I asked all SAR readers to send me their tests to check out the results. This is the first test done by DigitalVersus. It is the first website that compares the new Leica M $8000 camera (here at Amazon) versus the first NEX Full Frame camera (The VG900). They used the same [shoplink 20202 ebay]Leica 50mm Summilux-M lens (here on eBay)[/shoplink] on both cameras. And both cameras have a Full Frame 24 Megapixel CMOS sensor. So what are the results?

Please visit the website to see all image comparisons. Here you can see one of them (Click on it to enlarge):

In short the Leica M is sharper and has richer colors. This may be possible because of the lack of the anti-alias filter. The VG900 is a video camcorder and to have an Anti Aliasing filter makes a lot of sense (otherwise you end up having video clips with lots of moire).

What do you think of the results? Would the [shoplink 20202 ebay]Leica 50mm Summilux-M lens[/shoplink] work fine on the NEX-FF?

 

 

Sony RX1R review at ePhotozine. And Canon 5DIII comparison.

ePhotozine posted a new RX1R review.

The Sony Cyber-shot RX1R is a very slightly improved camera compared to the original RX1 with the AA filter removed it has the potential to deliver slightly sharper images, although with the added risk of moiré appearing. The difference is quite subtle and you would be hard pressed to see the difference without comparing results side by side.

And SAR reader Jedi compared the RX1R with the Canon 5DmarkIII at ForcePhotos.fr. The RX1R images looks way sharper don’t you think?

New RX orders:
RX1 at Amazon, BHphoto, Adorama, WexUK, Sonystore US, Sony Canada, Sony Deutschland, Sony UK, Sony France, Sony Italy, Sony Netherland, Sony Belgium, Sony Austria, Sony Sweden, Sony Finland, Sony Spain.
RX100MII at Amazon, BHphoto, Adorama, WexUK, Sonystore USSony Canada, Sony DeutschlandSony UK, Sony FR, Sony Italy, Sony Netherland, Sony Belgium, Sony Austria, Sony Sweden, Sony Finland, Sony Spain.

Zeiss 50mm tested at ePhotozine. First RX100MII user reviews.

ePhotozine (Click here) tested the new Sony Zeiss 50mm f/1.4 SSM lens. They write:

“There is no doubting that this lens performs well enough to justify the Carl Zeiss blue badge on the lens barrel, but whether it performs well enough to justify such a price will be debatable for many users.”

That this lens isn’t supersharp at f/1.4 aperture may not be an issue at all. I prefer a good creamy look and decent bokeh over top-notch sharpness. Zeiss preorders are available at Amazon, Adorama and SonyStore USA. In Europe at Wex UK, Amazon DE and Technikdirekt DE. In Asia it is in Stock at Digitalrev and on [shoplink 19177 ebay]eBay[/shoplink].

The Sony RX100MII is still selling well and the first 20 user reviews have been posted on Amazon (Click here). And it’s not a surprise to see such a good feedback!

 

US deals reminder:
new Sony SAL-70400G2 is in Stock via third party reseller at Amazon US (Click here).
Up to $200 savings on SLT cameras at Amazon (Click here).
The RX1R ships on August 8 according to SonyStyle US (Click here) and is in Stock at Adorama (Click here)
Earn 2,800 Sony Rewards points at SonyStyle US (Click here).
Save up to $900 on Select Sony NEX-VG900 Full Frame Interchangeable Lens Camcorder Bundles at Amazon US (Click here).
Save up to $70 on Select Sony Cyber-shot Digital Cameras at Amazon US (Click here).
Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 A-mount lens will ship any day now at Amazon (Click here), BHphoto (Click here) and Adorama (Click here).

 

16-50mm E lens review at Photozone. Sigma lens gets DxOmarked.

Image courtesy: Photozone.

Photozone tested the 16-50mm E-mount lens:

The Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS broke a couple of records but unfortunately not in the positive sense. Its uncorrected distortion and vignetting figures are nothing short of insane. So Sony obviously doesn’t want the lens to be used without enabled aberration compensation.

And the two Sigma ART NEX lenses also got tested:
Sigma 30mm f/2.8 DN A MFT at DxOmark (Click here): “In fact, it’s really only an average performer, but at $199, it’s sensitively priced and suitably complements some of the more affordable MFT camera models.
Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN A MFT at DxOmark (Click here): “As for the optical quality, the 60mmputs in a solid a performance. And, at $239, it‘s not inaccessibly priced.

Remember when cameras used to have mirrors? (Stefan Grosjean).

Image credit: Stefan Grosjean (www.stefangrosjean.com)

 

SAR readers Stefan Grosjean (www.stefangrosjean.com – attention nude pics on that website) is a 36 years old photographer from Switzerland, Europe, and specialized in nude and glamour photography. His photos are quite popular, reaching 30 million views on deviantART.com alone.

Nude photography as an art are concerned with aesthetic qualities and creativity; thus any erotic interest, although often present, is secondary (More about the history on Wikipedia). I am pleased to see that Stefan uses Sony cameras for his work. This is the text he sent me to introduce his work:

Image credit: Stefan Grosjean (www.stefangrosjean.com)

Stefan Grosjean:

10 years from now your classic DSLR will maybe only be a niche product targeted at older photographers who want to keep working with the system they used their whole life. But if a rookie comes into the camera store they will probably recommend a DSLM camera for him.
“What is DSLM?”, asks the customer.
“It’s short for digital single lens mirrorless”, replies the seller.
“Why would my camera have a mirror?”, asks the customer, “and why is it called ‘single lens’? I want a camera with interchangeable lenses!.”
Yes, DSLM is a bid of a weird name, that only makes sense if you know the history behind it. It’s called ‘single lens’ because before there were cameras with a mirror, a camera needed a second lens for the viewfinder. But today every camera on a smart phone is a “single lens camera” and the term is not really that meaningful anymore. And the same goes for the “mirrorless” part. And smart phone camera doesn’t have mirror. So why do you name a camera after what it doesn’t have and why do you call it single lens when one of its best features is that you can use more than a single lens?
I started as an ambitious amateur in 2008 with the first DSLM on the market, which was [shoplink 19992 ebay]Panasonic’s Lumix G1[/shoplink]. Since I was shooting beautiful women I had a large growing audience, but sometimes people’s comments on my photos were “good model, bad image quality”. After two years of this I switched to a full frame camera, which was the Canon 5D Mark II with the Canon 24-70mm f2.8 lens. Since I always missed the electronic viewfinder, I immediately switched to [shoplink 14165]Sony’s Alpha99[/shoplink] when it came out late in 2012.

Image credit: Stefan Grosjean (www.stefangrosjean.com)

Looking back from today I have to say the two years I worked with the classical DSLR camera were an absolute low point in my creative career. Don’t get me wrong! I see a lot of photographers who take better pictures than I do and they make it with a classical Canon or Nikon DSLR. I’m a big admirer of those photographers not only for their beautiful pictures but also because they can do it with a DSLR, which is in my experience much harder.

In the last few years the electronic viewfinder was sometimes criticized for not giving you the real picture. But it’s actually the other way around, isn’t it? When I shoot with the Sony a99 I see exactly what the result looks like in the viewfinder. I often work with quite complicated lighting setups involving five or more flashes. In a setting like this chances are high that not all flashes fire every time. Working with the Canon equipment was very stressful for me because of this. Let’s say I’m in the middle of the shooting and all of a sudden the magic happens, by which I mean the model strikes a perfect pose – a pose she will probably not be able to redo in this perfection later. So now are those few seconds where I can get that particular shot we did all this preparation for. But with a DSLR I constantly have to make very difficult and incredibly stressful decision: Should I go with the flow and keep on pressing the shutter to make sure we get a few variations of the perfect pose or should I stop the flow and take the camera down and wait for the picture to appear on the little screen to make sure all the flashes are firing the way they’re supposed to, but ultimately risking that the perfect pose is gone forever.

With an electronic viewfinder I don’t have to worry about this. Not only is the shooting much more enjoyable for me like this, I’m also getting much more and better pictures because I can see right in the viewfinder if there’s a problem.
If you’re following Sony Alpha Rumors you probably know that the a99 still has a mirror. As you know it’s a special mirror that doesn’t move and it’s also semitransparent. But sometimes not everybody seems to understand why it’s there in the first place. It has one purpose and one purpose only: to direct light to the phase detection autofocus. This was maybe the best solution for a camera that hit the markets last year but it never was an ideal solution, simply because it takes away approximately one sixth of the light that reaches the sensor and it can also produce a small amount of scattered light.

Sony of course knew this and that’s why they built the RX1 which is a full frame camera without phase detection autofocus and therefore without any kind of mirror. So yes, it’s true, the RX one has a little bit better image quality than Sony’s flagship a99, but the a99 has a phase detection autofocus which is supposed to be faster especially in low light conditions.
But for my kind of work it has another huge disadvantage: the autofocus fields are all in the center. But because I take a lot of full-bodied pictures the face of my models usually ends up more towards the corners, which means I have to pan the camera after autofocusing. And with this I lose what I’m supposed to win with the PDAF: very fast and very accurate focus.

For a photographer like me the current rumors about the new Sony system, be at “Alpha” or “Nex” is very exciting. We are looking forward to see the first full frame camera that has no mirror whatsoever, interchangeable lenses and a fast and reliable autofocus right on the sensor – it’s going to be a milestone. Sony is about to write history.

Stefan Grosjean.
(www.stefangrosjean.com)

———–

If you want to write an article for SonyAlphaRumors please contact me (Andrea) at sonyalpharumors@gmail.com. Thanks!

Preparing for the NEX-FF. Let me know how third party lenses work on the VG900!

If there is really a NEX-FF coming…and with in body IS than this is great news for all third party Full Frame lens owners. But I understand there is a big concern about the image quality that you can achieve with these lenses on a Full Frame E-mount camera. I am sure the NEX-FF camera will handle this better than the VG900 does. But I would be interested to see some VG900 + [shoplink 19605 ebay]Leica M Lenses[/shoplink], [shoplink 19923 ebay]Voigtlander M lenses[/shoplink], [shoplink 16763 ebay]Canon FD lenses[/shoplink], [shoplink 19360 ebay]Zeiss ZM lenses[/shoplink] and more thrid party lens tests… Please share the links to test you wdid or found on the web!

To share the link comment this post or send me an email at sonyalpharumors@gmail.com. Thanks!